
A long time ago in a place not far distant from central London, I was
being lectured about the nature of treason.
What, I was asked, did the traitor see in the mirror each morning as he
shaved? Traitor or patriot?
It was an ambiguous lesson, without fixed context, given credence
only by the fact that we both worked for the Security Service. The context I only discovered later, and by
then he’d already made his decision.
Now, a lifetime later, the business of intelligence has, for me,
become the business of communications – from gathering information and keeping
it secret to distilling information and making it public.
On the surface, there are few obvious similarities between those
two very different worlds.
After all, the task of the Security Service involves shining
discreet torches into dark places at the edge of reason and learning enough
about the dragons that lurk there to keep them safely locked away
The business of marketing and public relations, by contrast,
involves shining media spotlights to get companies and their products and
systems noticed. It certainly doesn’t involve lights being
hidden under bushels.
There is, however, one enormous similarity between the two. Let me explain.
Once upon a time it used to be that people needed products to
survive. Now, it’s the other way
around. Products need people to
survive. In a business context, and in a
market economy, companies need customers to survive.
In a cluttered market, whether the product is baked beans,
carpeting or a window system, every product needs a buyer – and most products
and companies have competitors. You have
competitors, I have competitors – and we’re always working to invent a better
widget.
What makes us successful, or not, is the glue that binds product
to customer. That glue is marketing –
the diffuse process by which we attract enquiries and convert those enquiries
into sales.
Within that conversion process, the central element in any
successful marketing strategy is information.
We need to provide potential customers with the essential information to
buy our product rather than someone else’s.
So far, so self-evident.
Yet that’s precisely the central element that a great many firms fail to
recognise in devising marketing or promotional campaigns. The information that customers need to make
that buying decision is confused by poor messaging or corporate techno-babble.
Indeed, some firms’ corporate communications are so full of
technical information to be impenetrable.
Time after time, I see corporate literature or websites that convey huge
amounts of information that the firm thinks it wants to communicate - but not
the essential information that the potential customer will want to hear.
Marketing is about much more than a glossy brochure or fancy web
presence. It’s more than pricing policy,
distribution channels or glitzy advertising.
It’s certainly much more than spending oodles of dosh on fancy corporate
identities.
It’s about recognising information as a valuable commodity and
using that information to manage the human imagination, whether in traditional
media or on new channels such as LinkedIn or Twitter.
Sounds fanciful? Well,
maybe. Essentially, however, we buy a
product because we’re pretty sure it’ll work.
We may know that the product has been around for a while, therefore it’s
reliable. We may believe that the firm
producing it also reliable and therefore to be trusted.
It’s why large firms spend equally large sums of money on
promotion and PR. What they’re
essentially buying, by communicating information about themselves, is customer
trust. By making their brand visible
they’re buying market credibility.
It’s a marketing dilemma that many smaller firms simply don’t
address. To achieve visibility, so the
argument goes, will cost us an arm and a leg and therefore we can’t afford the
pounds of flesh, particularly when times are tough. Except, of course, good promotion doesn’t
need to cost the earth.
There is no reason why smaller firms can’t also play the
promotional game – especially those firms in niche sectors who can legitimately
claim particular expertise in specialist markets. It merely involves distilling key facts and
figures and promoting corporate and product information online and offline in
ways that potential customers will find digestible.
Back in the Security Service bar, I wondered why Mike Bettany was
speculating aloud about the nature of treason.
Soon afterwards, he was arrested for attempted espionage, trying to
peddle the State’s secrets to the Soviet’s men in leather coats. He was sent down for a very long time.
Mike, it seemed, also knew the value of information and how to
sell it, for whatever expedient reason or moral justification. For the Russians, that information may have
been extremely valuable. For Mike, poor
sod, the price had a more personal cost.
As I said, it’s about information and its value. The marketing and intelligence worlds aren’t
that far apart.
We are specialists in national and
international PR strategy and delivery.
You can contact us at +44 (0) 1620 844736 or
Charlie@davidgraypr.com or connect with us on LinkedIn or Facebook.
No comments:
Post a Comment